ASBO Order for Environmental Health Legislation

ASBO Order for Environmental Health LegislationWrite a cabinet paper on the strength for ASBOs to contribute to the impelling enforcement of legislation enforced by environmental health departments.The following are the arguments in favour of ASBOs contributing or having the potential difference to contribute to the effective enforcement of the legislation carried out by environmental health departments across the country. The Prime Minister has already expressed in public his determination to reduce and reach anti-social behavior and allow the general public to feel safer and have the problems associated with anti-social behaviour reduced. ASBOs have already proved that they have potential in make Britain a cleaner and safer place to live in. Between their introduction from 1 April 1999 and the 31 March 2004, 2455 ASBOs were approved and enforced showing the determination of the police, environmental health departments and social services amongst others to reducing the proble ms associated with anti-social behaviour.1ASBOs are an alternative sanction available to both environmental health departments and ultimately the police to learn that legislation is enforced and public order is maintained. Environmental health departments have to meet requirements such as reducing the level of graffiti, vandalism and litter or tackling noise nuisance, all of which can be considered anti-social behaviour and can lead to the involvement of the police and the courts. Such behaviour either directly effects justness abiding people, intimidates them or blights their lives with fear. ASBOs have the potential and the intention of protecting the property, the environment and the personal safety of the majority of law-abiding people. They are intended to pip the anti-social behaviour carried out by the law breaking minorities that ruin the lives of the most vulnerable and cause social, economic and environmental damage to local communities.2Tackling anti-social behaviour by the use of ASBOs has the potential to make people feel safer as well as improving the physical environment they live in. The wrick of environmental health departments is closely linked with not only the police but also social services and local education authorities as in that location are strong connections between truancy and youths being involved in anti-social behaviour and crime. Close co-operation between these agencies increases the potential of ASBOs to decrease crime, peoples fear of crime whilst making Britain a better place to live in. This administration should take pride in been able to reduce peoples fear of being the victims of crime. The British crime survey has shown a fall from 40% in 1995 to 26% in 2004 of people expecting to be the victims of crime and anti-social behaviour or believing that they faced such a risk. If ASBOs allow environmental health departments and other agencies to reduce the amount of graffiti and vandalism macroscopical and counter the presence of gangs that fear of crime should diminish further as should the risk.3ASBOs offer the potential to break up the gangs that break the law through acts of vandalism, graffiti and other forms of anti-social behaviour by banning individuals from the estates or areas they cause damage in. Breaking up gangs would mean that environmental health departments could deal with individuals rather than more intimidating gangs. ASBOs can allow agencies such as environmental health departments and the police to control, punish or rehabilitate minor offenders whilst avoiding impoundment were possible. However ASBOs it should be stressed are not a soft option and the breaking of their conditions should result in further appropriate attain been taken to curb anti-social behaviour including ultimately imprisonment.4Through the use of ASBOs environment health departments have the potential to tackle long offenders without spending so much time preparing prosecutions whilst still being t o prosecute people that breach their ASBOs. While any ASBO is still in operation the onus remains on environmental health departments, social services and the police to monitor the behaviour of those subject to ASBOs. ASBOs can be used as part of the governments crime reduction targets. 5 Central government can offer incentives for local authorities to tackle anti-social behaviour and has already allocated extra resources to the areas worst change by anti-social behaviour. The success of environmental health departments in tackling anti-social behaviour go out be measured with little extra cost through the Comprehensive functioning Assessment process already carried out by the Audit Commission that monitors local authorities provision of services. The public will be able to influence out which local authorities are the most effective and will be able to press the less effective councils into taking further action.6ASBOs potentially allow environmental health departments to fulfi l their legislative obligations by diffusing and stopping anti-social behaviour more efficiently and with greater speed. The removal of persistent offenders or gang ringleaders will show the determination and effectiveness of environmental health department to enforce the law properly and completely. ASBOs have the potential to reduce anti-social behaviour whilst the involvement of environmental health departments and other agencies could allow the police to switch their resources to tackling more serious crimes. Anti-social behaviour whitethorn not evermore be considered to be major crime yet it can lead to it hence the importance of ASBOs in reducing the problem. Reducing anti-social behaviour will not only enhance the publics quality of life it would prove cost effective in terms of lower expenditure in cleaning up graffiti and property damage as well as fewer people in overcrowded prisons.7The availability of ASBOs offers the potential for environmental health departments to cl ean up areas of environmental damage or anti-social behaviour that impacts on the environment such as noise pollution, juvenile crime and vandalism. opposite areas in which ASB0s have the potential to allow environmental health departments fulfil their statuary requirements include countering anti-social behaviour caused by drinking and to a lesser extent begging in public. There are certainly strong links between heavy drinking (and drug taking) with anti-social or criminal behaviour.8 around crimes such as burglary, car crime and robbery have fallen significantly in 2004-05 by 20%, 17% and 12% respectively. However the potential of ASBOs to work effectively for environmental health departments, the police and other agencies would increase with measures against binge drinking. Binge drinking is directly connected to most knock-down-and-drag-out crime and anti-social behaviour. ASBOs are part of the solution to environmental health departments meeting their statutory requirements yet will work best in compounding with other strategies and through co-operation with other agencies.9BibliographyCoxall B, Robins L Leach R (2003) Contemporary British Politics 4th edition, Palgrave, LondonDodd T, Nicholas S, Povey D and Walker A (2004) foot Office Statistical Bulletin, Crime in England and Wales 2003/04, Crown Copyright, LondonHome Office (2005) The Government Reply to the Fifth Report from the Home Affairs committee Session 2004/05 HC80 Anti-Social behaviour, Crown Copyright, LondonJones M and Lowe R (2002) From Beveridge to Blair The first fifty years of Britains Welfare State 1948-98, Manchester University Press Manchester and New York.Slack, R drunk yobs blamed for record violent crimes, Daily Mail 21st July 2005www.homeoffice.gov.uk Crime Policing / Anti-Social Behaviour Orders Legally Binding UndertakingI (Barry Vale) undertake that in grapevine with my contractual obligations this work is completely original, and has not been copied from any websit e or any other source, either in whole or in part.By submitting this work I understand that if my work is found to be plagiarised I will not only forfeit my fee but also be subject to legal proceedings in order to recover damages for loss of profit and damage to business reputation.Moreover, I understand that I whitethorn be subject to legal proceedings from any third parties, such as the end clients and copyright holders of the original work who may have had their rights infringed or suffered loss as a result of my actions.I also understand that in addition I will be liable to a atomic number 6/$200 administration charge and that I may be liable for legal costs.I understand that this e-mail and the work I am submitting may be used as evidence against me if I breach this undertaking.Please take this to constitute my electronic signature(Barry Vale)1 www.homeoffice.gov.uk2 Home Office (2005) p.33 Dodd, Nicholas, Povey Walker (2004) p. 184 Home Office (2005) p. 65 Coxall, Robins Le ach, (2003), p.2756 Home Office (2005) p.17 Coxall, Robins Leach (2003) p. 2768 Jones and Lowe (2002) p. 1899 Slack, Daily Mail 21st July 2005